WOLFGANG AMADEUS MOZART - THE MAGIC FLUTE complete

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b11ElH3qm2M

WOLFGANG AMADEUS MOZART - THE MAGIC FLUTE complete

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b11ElH3qm2M

El artículo "Una mezcla mortal en Bengasi" del New York Times: un intento de encubrimiento que culpa sin querer a Obama

http://spanish.larouchepac.com/node/20982

El artículo "Una mezcla mortal en Bengasi" del New York Times: un intento de encubrimiento que culpa sin querer a Obama



6 de enero de 2014 — El artículo escrito por David Kikpatrick y publicado en el New York Times del 28 de diciembre pasado, titulado "Una mezcla mortal en Bengasi", se ha venido denunciando ampliamente como un encubrimiento del gobierno de Obama. Y en verdad el artículo es un encubrimiento en varios niveles: 1) el artículo argumenta falsamente que no existen evidencias de que al-Qaeda u otros grupos terroristas internacionales hayan tenido alguna participación en el asalto; 2) el artículo también alega falsamente, como lo afirmara inicialmente Susan Rice y otros funcionarios del gobierno, que el ataque a la misión y el anexo de la CIA fue "instigado en gran parte por el odio al video hecho en Estados Unidos denigrando al Islam". En este contexto el artículo deja por fuera el video que subió el líder de al-Qaeda, Ayman al Zawahiri, justo antes de Bengasi, en donde hace un llamado a vengarse contra Estados Unidos por el asesinado de Abu Yahah al Libi con avión robot en Paquistán y el hecho de que su hermano mayor, Abdal Wahhab Mohammad Qaid, es un miembro dirigente del Grupo Combatiente Islámico Libio (GCIL) en Libia; 3) el artículo no se refiere al asunto del tráfico de armas de Bengasi a Siria, autorizado por Obama, que involucraba a la Brigada 17 de Febrero; y 4) el artículo tampoco informa sobre el financiamiento del ataque a Bengasi por parte de Arabia Saudita.

Habiendo dicho esto, el artículo irónicamente confirma lo que ha venido documentando desde hace mucho LaRouchePAC y la revista EIR, en el sentido de que la gente que atacó la misión estadounidense y el anexo de la CIA en Bengasi el 11 de septiembre del 2012, fueron las milicias con las que se alió Obama en su guerra ilegal para derrocar el gobierno de Gadafi. Como dice Kirkpatrick: Estados Unidos "en última instancia perdió a su embajador en un ataque que involucró tanto a abiertos opositores de Occidente como a combatientes pertenecientes a las milicias que los americanos habían hecho sus aliados".

Lo que no dice es que el núcleo de las fuerzas con las que se alió Obama era el GCIL encabezado por Abdelhakim Belhadj. Los líderes del GCIL combatieron junto a al-Qaeda en Afganistán. Se mudaron a Sudán con Osama bin Laden. El GCIL también se fusionó oficialmente con al-Qaeda el 3 de noviembre del 2007.

Al no identificar al GCIL como un afiliado de al-Qaeda, Kirkpatrick miente que "Bengasi no estuvo infiltrado por al-Qaeda".

Así que, la distinción entre milicias locales con las que se alió Obama en Libia y el núcleo de al-Qaeda que supuestamente no estuvo involucrado, es una mentira, perpetrada en la realidad por al-Qaeda con el propósito de camuflar su presencia.

El artículo se enfoca en Abu Khattala, como el supuesto cabecilla del ataque a la misión y alega que "no se le conoce afiliación a grupos terroristas". Al mismo tiempo dice que "estaba firmemente metido en las redes de las milicias en Bengasi".

El artículo alega que él fue el que asesinó al general Abdal Fatah Yunis el 28 de julio del 2011, jefe del ala militar del Consejo de Transición Nacional, pero uno de los subalternos de Yunis sostuvo en ese entonces que los asesinos formaban parte de la Brigada 17 de Febrero. El asesinato de Yunis le abrió el camino a Belhadj para que emergiera como el comandante del Consejo Militar de Trípoli. Desde esa posición él era el responsable de la seguridad de todas las embajadas extranjeras.

Como lo ha documentado LaRouchePAC y la EIR, [1] la Brigada 17 de Febrero, que fue contratada para proteger la misión estadounidense, fue fundada por el emir del GCIL Belhadj, quien era también el vínculo del embajador Chris Stevens con la oposición. Todas las milicias con diferentes nombres en Bengasi operan bajo el paraguas del GCIL.

Por ejemplo, Sufian bin Qumu, el líder de Ansar al-Sharia, con sede en Derna, ha sido identificado como miembro del GCIL y de al-Qaeda. Ex prisionero de Guantánamo que recibía estipendios mensuales de uno de los financiadores del ataque original del 11 de septiembre del 2001, es conocido por haber entrenado a combatientes yihadistas para que derrocaran a Gadafi a partir de abril del 2011. Y sin embargo Kirkpatrick insiste en que "parece que ni el señor Qumu ni nadie más en Derna tuvieron un papel significativo en el ataque a la misión estadounidense". Esto a pesar del hecho de que Ansar al-Sharia inicialmente se adjudicó la responsabilidad del ataque. ¿Desde cuando "parece que" se presenta como evidencia?

Kirkpatrick también destaca que una de las personas que fue parte de la coartada de Abu Khattala fue Wisam bin Hamid, el dirigente de Escudo Libio, quien la primavera pasada (2013) dijo que había decidido convertir al señor Abu Khattala en una especie de juez local de bienes raíces. Bin Hamid dijo: "El es bueno en esto. Es una persona sincera. La gente lo respeta".

Pero ¿quien es el protector de Abu Khattala, Wisan bin Hamid? La Biblioteca del Congreso de EU publicó un informe en agosto del 2011 en donde se dice que posiblemente Wisan bin Hamid es el líder de al-Qaeda en Libia y que patrocinó en marzo del 2012 una manifestación en Sirte a la que asistió como invitado de honor el líder de al-Qaeda en el Maghreb, Mokhtar Bel Mokhtar. Bin Hamid participó también en una concentración en Bengasi con otras milicias el 7 y 8 de junio del 2012. La Biblioteca del Congreso reporta que estas milicias "probablemente conforman el grueso de las redes de al-Qaeda en Libia".

Kirkpatrick informa: "La única conexión de inteligencia de al-Qaeda al ataque fue la llamada telefónica interceptada esa noche de un participante en la primera ola de ataques a un amigo en otro país africano, quien tiene ligas con miembros de al-Qaeda". No dice sin embargo que la llamada fue a Mokhtar Bel Mokhtar, quien organizó después, el 13 de enero del 2013, un ataque terrorista en contra del campo gasífero en Argelia.

La otra evidencia que presenta Kirkpatrick, que confirma que el ataque a la misión y al anexo por parte de los aliados de Obama fue un trabajo interno y externo, es el hecho de que, según sus palabras, "los lideres de las milicias libias que pudieron haber intervenido para ayudarle a los americanos se lavaron las manos del ataque".

Específicamente cita a Abdul Salam Bargathi, quien estaba en el cuarto de operaciones conjuntas de las milicias en los cuarteles generales de la Brigada 17 de Febrero cuando se produjo el ataque. Bargathi indicó que le dijo a los guardias de la Brigada 17 de Febrero que estaban en la misión: "No disparen. Solo váyanse del lugar". Bergathi también confesó que los dirigentes de Ansa al-Shariah se le unieron en el cuarto de operaciones un poco después de que empezó el ataque".

Imaginen esto: La milicia que atacó la misión está en el cuarto de operaciones conjuntas con la milicia contratada para defender la misión. ¿Cómo es que se puede llegar a ninguna otra conclusión, que no sea que esto fue una operación conjunta?

Por lo tanto, como lo han mantenido LaRouchePAC y la EIR, la Brigada 17 de Febrero fundada por Belhadj, que fue contratada para proteger la misión, trabajaba directamente con Ansar al-Sharia, que fue la encargada del ataque. Lo que Kirkpatrick no informa es que Ansar al-Sharia recibió financiamiento del Ministerio de la Defensa de Libia a través de la Brigada 17 de Febrero, tanto antes como después del 11 de septiembre del 2012

Por lo tanto, como se afirmó al principio, aunque la intención del artículo de Kirkpatrick es un encubrimiento diseñado para proteger a Obama, la realidad es que la evidencia que presenta sin querer, confirma que Obama cometió traición al aliarse con el Grupo Combatiente Islámico Libio, afiliado a al-Qaeda en una guerra ilegal por derrocar a Gadafi y después fueron los aliados a al-Qaeda de Obama en Libia los que mataron a nuestro embajador y otros tres estadounidenses.

Enlaces:

[1] http://larouchepac.com/factsheet

Obama arroja otros dos millones de estadounidenses al basurero humano

http://spanish.larouchepac.com/node/20981

Obama arroja otros dos millones de estadounidenses al basurero humano



6 de enero de 2014 — Las políticas de Obama aceleran la desintegración de la economía física de Estados Unidos, exactamente como lo recetan las políticas de despoblación del imperio británico. Por ejemplo, el 28 de diciembre se acabaron las prestaciones de desempleo a largo plazo para unos 1.3 millones de estadounidenses desempleados, lo que va a tener enormes efectos no lineales. El economista de Harvard Lawrence Katz dijo en una conferencia telefónica organizada por los demócratas en la Cámara de Representantes el 3 de enero que ese 1'300,000 de personas va a perder un promedio de $305 dólares por semana, lo que equivale a $400 millones por semana. Pero con base en al "efecto multiplicador" de cancelar el programa de prestaciones, Katz dijo en el diario londinense The Guardian, que la pérdida total de la economía sería de" hasta mil millones por semana", según los cálculos de la Oficina de Presupuesto del Congreso.

Ese cálculo no es más que puramente monetario y ni siquiera se aproxima a reflejar el impacto real sobre la economía física de arrojar a 1'300,000 norteamericanos más al basurero humano. Este es el programa de Hitler, tal y como lo dicta la reina británica, enfatizó Lyndon LaRouche el domingo y ya está golpeando a la población estadounidense, como lo sabemos por nuestras actividades organizativas por todo el país.

Los desempleados de largo plazo son los que han estado desempleados por más de seis meses. Con George W. Bush, cuando entraron en vigor las disposiciones para extender el desempleo, el desempleo era de 5.6% y la duración promedio de desempleo era de 17 semanas, informa The Guardian. Hoy, la tasa oficial de desempleo es de 7% (el desempleo real es por lo menos el doble), en tanto que la duración promedio de desempleo es ahora de 36 semanas.

El gobierno de Obama anda ocupado derramando lágrimas de cocodrilo por la cancelación de las extensión de las prestaciones, después de haberle urgido a los demócratas que sacrificaran estas disposiciones como parte del acuerdo presupuestal con los republicanos. Obama se va a reunir en la Casa Blanca el martes con un grupo de estadounidenses que acaban de perder sus prestaciones de desempleo a largo plazo, en una especie de foto del recuerdo antes de irse a las cocinas públicas. El secretario del Trabajo, Thomas Perez, hizo un llamado para que se restablezcan las prestaciones, las que calificó de "recurso vital".

Steny Hoyer, el líder de la minoría demócrata en la Cámara de Representantes, dijo que el Senado va a votar la próxima semana sobre una medida que reintroduce las prestaciones, y dijo "que el Congreso deje que expire este programa mientras todavía continua la recuperación del empleo (sic), es desde mi perspectiva, insensato e irresponsable" .

Más al punto, lo que es "insensato e irresponsable" es dejar a Obama en la Casa Blanca para que siga llevando a cabo las políticas de despoblación de la reina.

SCIENCE & CHRISTMASTIME by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. December 25, 2013

http://larouchepac.com/node/29317

Updated version posted 7:43pm Eastern, 12/26/13.

The New Year’s day now before us:

SCIENCE & CHRISTMASTIME

by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

December 25, 2013

To review the relevant history:

The most important evidence gathered during the passage of this midday’s discussions among our leading circles, now concerns the revolutionary statements from a collection of associated nations assembled explicitly around both President Putin’s Russia and a group of associated nations being apparently gathered together as a newly re-defined gathering among nations ranging, along the northern Coast of Eurasia, from Belarus to the Pacific coast, now affirming their respects for the sovereignty of the nations to the south of those particular borders.

The probably indicated borders are not settled matters; but, the suggested outcomes of what remain more or less settled directions of concluded intentions, have been, to say the least, strong indications, and should be assessed with due modesties, accordingly, all for purposes of current discussions.

The pivotal implication for this moment, is (1) that the attempted trans-Atlantic capture of Ukraine by the de facto trans-Atlantic western alliance, has been rather decisively set back, thus far, and, (2) that there are crucially important other indications that, the new eastern arrangements reflect a rising physical-economic advantage, gained by the indicated Eurasian partisans, that with respect to the accelerating physical-economic collapse underway under the reign of the Anglo-American faction, and in its suggested current parameters.

By no means does this mean a victory of the trans-Eurasian over the trans-Atlantic sector at this time. What Russia’s current proposals represent is re-establishment of a sovereign region of economic cooperation, amounting to a revised approach toward the same political-economic systems of cooperation which had been reached between U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt and among the allies associating themselves with the leadership of U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt’s guidance. The essential feature of that is a tendency toward re-assembly of the allied powers under the leadership-role of President Franklin Roosevelt, as opposed to the implicitly treasonous factors introduced under the Churchill-Truman atrocity.

I direct our recollections of the relevant facts of history, to a moment when the leadership of the U.S. World War II command under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, feared that President Franklin Roosevelt was about to die, and feared a pre-prepared disaster for both the United States and most of the allies, which would be set into confusion among one another. On this account, now view President Putin’s arguments accordingly. It is not the same package presented by U.S. President Franklin D Roosevelt, but it was the agreement which President Franklin Roosevelt had secured, and which the British empire’s Winston Churchill, and such Churchill accomplices as former Hitler supporters, Prescott Bush and his London-Cabal cronies, had conspired to destroy at the relevant times.

By the time that a new U.S. election had occurred, not only had a new party established a pro-Churchill grip within what had been the U.S. government of President Franklin Roosevelt, but the right-wing Anglophile opportunists were entrenched; only President Franklin Roosevelt’s administration now existed to defend the essential interests of the United States against the anglophile opportunists gathered around the British imperialist faction which had been gathered around the eternal British imperialist Winston Churchill and Churchill’s Wall Street cronies.

The head of the OSS had muttered along the corridor leading to the White House exits (to his friend): “It’s over ...” “It’s all over.” Essentially, what the OSS chief had muttered to his companion, then, has proven to have been thoroughly all-too-true, to the very present day!

To speak honestly and very plainly, the founders of the United States, both the founders of the original Massachusetts government, and the United States, would have considered the present U.S. governments under George W. Bush, Jr. and Barack Obama as worse than treasonous. The evidence is solid, but most of the populist opinion on that subject currently, would be very sinfully, worse than silly at the very best. Most of it is far worse than silly; there is a large dose of treason mixed in, even among the ranks of the U.S. Presidency and other notable institutions.

In these present times, virtually no political voice in the United States will actually tell the truth about anything of national importance. They have claimed to have found an alternative to truth, in a rejection of any real meaning of truth, a truth which has been rejected in favor of so-called “popular opinion.”

For, consider what is permitted in institutions such as schools, that at various stages of behavior. There are sometimes truthful statements made (but rarely publicly); but our educational institutions do not believe in a principle of truth. The prevailing statement of education even among what might be considered well-meaning instructors, and even some students, is that a supposed reliance on teaching “the truth,” is masked by the demand that the teacher dictate the truth to the student, and that the textbooks should dictate (usually) to the teachers. Thus, the changing opinion among those who prize favorable gradings, over telling the truth, has successfully driven the currently educated bodies of our graduates who are presumed to be certifiably educated, to an accelerating current rate of disintegration of the minds of the current crop of products of accepted standards of educational practice.

Take, for example, the particular case of secondary school geometry. What is taught? Usually, “Euclidean” geometry, which has been a fraud which had become virtually the universal standard of teaching of science in what was miraculously regarded as Secondary School education, and, has been often experienced from the mouths of even relevant leading university professors. Take the case of even many regarded as leading scientists in Europe since no later than a putatively leading scientists’ opinion during the post-World War II education, as under Britain’s frankly, mass-murderously evil Bertrand Russell, as in contrast to such true scientists as Bernhard Riemann, Max Planck, or Albert Einstein, against the usual trash still taught as “scientific principles” then as now.

All that I have said, in these opening remarks here, presently, is true; but, that, in a certain, very significant degree, does not yet address the underlying frauds which continue to dominate even the supposedly leading circles of public belief and opinion.

The essential issue, which I will now introduce, having stated my preceding remarks, is rarely acknowledged as even existing. Hence, the prevalence of fraud in nearly all high-ranking opinion. The subject which must be forced into view, is the subject of the difference between the consistent lying of Zeus and the persistent honor of Prometheus.

I explain, appropriately, as follows.

ZEUS vs. PROMETHEUS

The contrast between Zeus and Prometheus, has been a relatively new phenomenon within the attributable history of mankind as a species. The actual origin of the pure uniqueness of the human species, is ancient, and appears as a point of distinction of man from beast: a distinction of mankind’s attribute of “cooking its food.” From such origins as that, the characteristic of mankind’s survival and progress as a species is distinguished best by references to the table of chemistry. Thence, man evolves willfully by means and aid of impulses directed toward successively rising levels of achievement in the tables of the functions of heat. This is not merely “heat” as heat-as-such, but, rather, the ingenious means employed in man’s utilization of the application of heat. Man’s relatively recent mastery of the use of nuclear and thermonuclear powers of practice marks the future, higher perspective for the future of mankind within the Solar System (and, implicitly beyond): that, as a metrical standard for the evolutionary revolutions expressed as the rise of our human species, from lower, to higher standards of achievements.

Therefore, whence the contrary expressions respecting the limits self-imposed by some relatively inferior parts of human behavior: parts which fail to meet the standards of limitless progress for the role of the human species, per capita? It is precisely that factor which distinguishes the inherent bestiality of the intentions of the (frankly Satanic) Zeus from the fiery creative passions of Prometheus-the-fire-bringer. That is, not so incidentally, the essential practical distinction of the British empire (for example) from the tendency of the intention underlying the purposes of such as the creation of the North American republic of that (already established) Massachusetts settlement of the 1660s, which found itself pitted against the inherent bestialities of the Anglo-Dutch tyrannies of the Seventeenth and the Eighteenth centuries, and beyond.

The distinction which I have just emphasized as a matter of illustration, is also an expression of the same difference which separates the notion of the principle of Prometheus from the intrinsic principle of evil which is expressed at the root of the expressed intentions of a Zeus, or of a Roman empire. It is the distinction of the effects of devotion to progress, through advances in the creative use of ever-richer concentrations of the principle of fire by our human species. The oligarchy, by contrast, is committed to the bestial Zeus’s intention, which is to prevent mankind’s progress (as the current Queen of England and Wall Street do), to prevent mankind’s evolutionary progress toward the achievement of higher qualities of the existence of man within the universe which he occupies. President Barack Obama’s suppression of the accomplishments in astronomy, is, specifically, an expression of the practice of Obama in all matters of interest. All of the unnecessary suffering of human beings throughout the planet which we presently inhabit, is fairly compared to the intrinsic principle of evil to which Obama, among others, have already devoted their present intentions.

Consider the elementary facts respecting the origins of Christianity, as in opposition to the Roman empire’s rule. Rome is the child of Zeus, and the enemy of the mission of Jesus. The child of Zeus is not located essentially in material resources, but in the evil of the Roman empire’s suppression of the inherently required dignity of the human personality in superseding the bestiality which Zeus imposes upon mankind. Let us be completely clear in this matter, as now follows.

The essential principle of creativity, which Christianity had heralded during its greatest moments, was not in mankind’s material acquisitions as such: but, in the accomplishments of the development of the human individual’s achievement of what may be regarded, therefore, as the source of the satisfactions delivered to the devoted companions of the Creator. It is mankind’s achievements of that specific quality of achievement which partakes of the essential quality of a divine intention.

The Case of That Silly Fellow

By “The Silly Fellow,” I mean to identify persons who, shall we say, “devoutly insist,” that the human individual is inherently incapable of foreknowledge, for knowing the future. Yet, all among the great advances of the member of the human species are provided to the members of our fellow human beings by individual persons who are actually “creative” scientifically (and in comparable respects) in the foreseeing of the means of achievement of something which had been hitherto unknown, such as the greatest among the actually creative scientific discoverers of modern (and, also, earlier) history. Take the case of Nicholas of Cusa as an excellent choice, for example, or, his dutiful followers the great discoverer Johannes Kepler, or a William Shakespeare who had identified the concept of the principle of “Chorus” as expressed in his King Henry V. Or, the case so of Gottfried Leibniz, Carl F. Gauss, Bernhard Riemann, Max Planck, and Albert Einstein.

Each among those illustrious cases gave birth to a leap into a domain which has been brought into active existence through revolutionary discoveries of universal principle, whose effect had been to elevate mankind’s condition to heights of achieved existence previously unknown by fellow mankind.

The pitiable fellow protests: “No one could know the future!” Yet, precisely such discoveries of what could not have been otherwise known, are the only basis for the devotion to progress of man’s service to the notion of the Creator. That devotion, whether a direct discovery of a hitherto unknown principle, or the promotion of the sharing of that achievement, is that which is an expressed devotion to the true intention of a true Creator.

THE HISTORY JUST AHEAD by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. December 24, 2013

http://larouchepac.com/node/29419

Suddenly, it’s all ominous!

THE HISTORY JUST AHEAD

by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

December 24, 2013

With yesterday’s announcement, that the U.S. intention is to move U.S. Army combat capabilities more forcefully into the Pacific theater, the combination of military forcesappears to have committed both Pacific and Atlantic “frontal” forces to the early prospect, of a general thermonuclear-armed, global war, one conducted by the increasingly, desperately bankrupt, so-called “allied forces.”

This occurs under the condition that the economy of the trans-Atlantic alliance, has just greatly accelerated the dive into physical bankruptcy taken by the trans-Atlantic powers, while the now emerging economic alliance of north and central Eurasian nations, is moving steadily into a coalition of sovereign governments, a coalition intended to be achieved by the time of the close of the immediately coming year.

The foreseeable circumstances of the immediately on-coming new year are, momentarily, such, that if U.S. President Obama’s de-facto current dictatorship retains power in the U.S.A., the Anglo-Dutch imperial forces will tend to maintain a postured commitment to thermonuclear warfare, against the nations of northern Eurasia, done within increasingly aggressive postures, and probable early deployment. The consequence of such a posture, would probably be an early extinction of the human species. Actual thermonuclear warfare under present capabilities, threatens to be like that.

Were Obama to be removed from office quickly, the U.S.A.’s tendency toward abandoning the Anglo-Dutch scheme, might become a serious, if not certain likelihood. Then, the medium-term perspective, might be the development of policies of constructive peace, and of ultimate economic recoveries among the greater part of the global nation-state authorities.

However, in the meantime, the bestialities of the Anglo-Dutch imperialism, may be quieted, but remain to be also quenched. In any case, “we must work at it,” as a likeness of the late U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt would have done, had he not died when he did.

I. THE SUBJECT OF THE GLOBAL OLIGARCHICAL PRINCIPLE

It will have been, hopefully, recalled, during the recent past days of this now passing December 2013, that the only serious hope for humanity, is that U.S. President Barack Obama will have been recalled from duty, that for excellent and urgent reasons, and, that the consequent revival of the souls of the U.S. population, will prevent the presently lurking threat of the human species’ thermonuclear extinction.

That now still-threatened outcome of the months ahead, could, and must be, immediately blocked and soon prevented; otherwise, it were even probable that “people were soon no more.” The British Queen’s already ongoing commitment to the extermination of about six billions persons out of the presently estimated seven, is already no longer merely threatened intentions; rather, the continued reign of President Obama in the United States, has also been “upgraded” to a massive increase of the death rate within the present U.S. population, during this present new year: unless he were soon removed from office. That is already a virtual U.S.A. legislative fact. Most among the Republican leaders, so far, seem to be insane in this respect, while most Democratic leaders appear to be seriously confused on this matter at this same time: an unleashing of the Democratic members of the Senate from the inclinations of what is, ostensibly, their present overseer (or, should we say, “whip,”) might be considered most helpful on this account—by some. Unfortunately, since the final illness of President Franklin Roosevelt, true courage against attempted tyrannies, has not been a strong point among either our own present political leaderships, or, also, even many ordinary citizens.

What I have just stated, in these immediately preceding paragraphs, contains no exaggeration by me. The question to be addressed to me, is, “how do we kick the relevant motor into starting? Where has the relevant ‘political guts’ been hiding itself?”

For useable answers, we must emphasize some crucially important recent facts, facts respecting the relative rise in power of a relatively large part of the main body of the Eurasian nations, nations which are now largely apart from the already ruined regions of Southwest Asia. There has been a gradually accelerating physical-economic strength, coming to the surface of trends in principal regions of Eurasia, that in sharp contrast to now highly accelerated declines in western regions of Europe and, in particular, the rapidly accelerated collapse of the economy of North America, the United States itself, most notably. The murderously disastrous ruin of the U.S. economy, is the most important factor in the fostering of the feasibility of the presently threatened, possibly very earlier outbreak of a global thermonuclear extermination of the human population. The presently rapid, virtually utter loss of the former agro-industrial ability of the United States, has been the most notable economic and general strategic factor in the entirety of the recently accelerating threat of a sudden outbreak of planetary thermonuclear warfare.

There could be no competently historical insight into this crucial factor—the U.S. factor—of the span of the recent and future history of the crisis which I have indicated here this far, without taking into account my own active part in the wave of the most crucial part of the history of the world since the passing of President Franklin Roosevelt.

It had all begun, in effect, at least, with the last moments of President Roosevelt’s life, as the OSS chief had then just recently departed from his last meeting with that President. By the time that my continued military service had transported me to India, I had found myself politically engaged in mourning the death of President Franklin Roosevelt, and, at the same time, finding myself uttering the working equivalent of a solemn dedication to the continuation of the mission of President Franklin Roosevelt, all that in opposition to the hateful political image of the newly cast President Harry S Truman. It was the taste of treason already prophetically embedded in everything that Truman was then, and later, which had stirred me, during those times, to a permanent dedication to the cause which Franklin Roosevelt had embodied immortally in my mind. I shared, in that memory, a rich memory of the wonderful former President John Quincy Adams’ living out of his own dedication to the future of our United States, and had felt the strong hand of President Franklin Roosevelt’s commitments, as an echo of President Washington, and of Alexander Hamilton’s murder by the British royal butcher, Aaron Burr, and of, notably, Presidents and the most American political martyrs-in-office, Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, and John F. Kennedy.

That fact, as known to me throughout the course of the ensuing decades, is what stirs my devotions to the future of all mankind, now, still, actively, today. It is not merely my memory; it was, and is a still-living, very active insight into the meaning of the ground of history through which I continue to walk, to walk as a still actively living active participant in the process which is the shaping of the Presidency of our United States and its mission for mankind. Those who had once known better than I had now later come to know, are presently given only the rarest of presently possible alternatives, that of the role of a qualified, still-active trustee of my own assigned devotion to the future of both our republic, and of mankind in a larger way. I encounter the effect of what is becoming now the fullness of a solitary reality, one of which I am most frequently, and most passionately reminded daily, since the retirement of the former President Bill Clinton from the Presidency, and from President Franklin Roosevelt’s Glass Steagall Law, alike. To know current history, one must live it, that done in a certain fullness of a life-long experience.

That much, which I have just stated, is indispensable; I think I need add no more than that, in particular, for the moment.

II. MAKING THE FUTURE NOW

On the condition that that much said in the preceding chapter, were already taken into account, we are freed to turn our attention to the future; it is done for that purpose, which should begin by looking backwards toward the outcome of what had been a successful peace among the nations: the actual future. The expressed practical aspects of the intentions now in the process of their design, must be clearly defined before attempting to explain why and how that result might be brought about.

By their nature, true leaders are those who have acquired that virtue of an experience which is foreseeing the future missions of mankind’s rise to what could and must be done, as also I have done for my part. Most of our species, presently, have lost an effective insight into the making of the future; they dwell in the drudgeries and monotonies of a bare, and often bleak experience, rather than the creating of the necessary future as such as Nicholas of Cusa and his followers in science had done.

At present, there could be no actually competent, scientific approaches to this challenge as a present one, without taking into account the essential distinction between the human species and forms of essentially animal life. That distinction is truly elementary, only when it is stated in precisely those terms, as I have summarized the elementary distinction in an earlier publication, to the following effect:¹

The Human Principle

Although, conventional opinion places the identities of Zeus and Prometheus, as characters confined to an ancient Greek mythology, the physical evidence of the chemistry expressed, is, that “Prometheus” is the name given to the model of a once actually living creature identified and equipped with the actual origins, and characteristics from which the origins of modern physical scientific practices are to be traced, historically, to the origins of the principle of human behavior based in the ever-upward evolutionary features of the origins of the practice which is, in turn, the unique quality of the ostensibly willful mode of upward evolutionary progress of the chemistry of the human species, a chemistry which has been uniquely specific to the relevant effects of the willfully induced effects which, in turn, are dependent upon the continuing evolutionary developments produced by the process of applied, anti-primitive modern chemistry. The avowed principle of the Prometheans, is their determination of true scientists to overthrow those intrinsically evil, intrinsically and viciously, and culturally stupefied and brutishly immoral, oligarchical cultures, such as those of the ancient Roman Empire, of the butchers who murdered the Trojans, and, who are the currently avowed devotees of the radically practiced “population-reduction” policies, of such as the British empire’s current Queen Elizabeth II, and of the current U.S.A.’s “Greenies” associated with the pro-genocide measures of that political class whose current has been recently set into motion, again, by the “Hitler-resembling” practices prescribed by the presently current decrees and other legislation of President Barack Obama.

The practical emphasis on the facts of the matter, must be placed genetically, exactly so.

Any doubt respecting my emphasis on the biological effects, pertains essentially to voluntary choices of members of the human species as such. Hence, the necessity of the precise Classical representation of the history of the opposition between the followers of Zeus, and those of the actual current candidates for association with the name of “The Prometheans.”

To Wit!

Actually, even the often so-called “greenies” could not have existed without a biological origin in the relevant sort of depraved characteristics of the human breed. We should perhaps emphasize the term: “It’s in the breed!” No actually practicing, true human being would deny a notion of biological necessity of upward evolutionary biological progress of the human species per se. It is to be strictly emphasized, that biology per se, has no natural basis in necessity of breeding as such; the determination of the development of the human individual is intrinsically voluntary, not otherwise simply biological. The development of the children of Zeus, on the other hand, is the product of a moral degeneration conditioned within the personalities and communities composed of those who share a disposition for the manifestations of the oligarchical type; they are the products of an acquired, diseased, or simply depraved pathology, not a biologically natural predisposition for the true progress of mankind.

Healthy modes of human cultural trends, are not “naturally” related to oligarchical characteristics of behavior. The point was demonstrated in the achievements of the culture of the so-called Golden Renaissance of such as Filippo Brunelleschi and Nicholas of Cusa. The prevalent mass-depravity incident during most of the following century demonstrates the expressions of the oligarchical influences of the enemies of Cusa and his legacy, a legacy including the generation of the Seventeenth-century period of the achievements of the Massachusetts Bay colony prior to its crushing by the evil Dutch tyrannies and by the later emergence of the intrinsically mass-murderous practices of the British empire through to the present date.

Similarly, the case of Thomas Jefferson’s disgusting departure from the original Presidency, and of the British monarchy’s official murderer Aaron Burr, typify the various mere scoundrels, such as the renegade Thomas Jefferson of his wicked days, on the one hand, and his sometimes sympathetic rival and accomplice, the British hired murderer, Aaron Burr on the other, who was the sponsor of both U.S. Presidents Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren, the latter a pair of a type bred from the environs of British-banker scoundrels of the British-banker riddled New York City region of the United States.

For a clearer insight into these matters, contrast the type of those British bankers and their likeness, to that actually United States’ principle of national banking which had been created by the same Alexander Hamilton who was the actual founder of the economic system of our originally constituted United States. The principle of U.S. banking’s founding, was not the exchange of money as merely money, but, instead, the physical-economic values of the goods produced and exchanged at an appropriately prescribed, rising track in physically relative values of exchange as such. The Glass-Steagall law established by the actions of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, echoes and typifies, thus, the standard of the original U.S. Dollar. Money-per-se has no intrinsic such value. (Hamilton had made the distinction perfectly clear.)

The notion of an intrinsic value of a monetary standard of exchange, depends, typically and intrinsically, on the increased physical value, per capita, of the U.S. dollar as such. In other words, a steady increase in the physically productive powers of labor. Money per se could never be an honest measure of value per se. The honest value of labor could never be anything but the increase of the physical benefit to humanity’s population, by the means of the increase of the effect of the physical increase, for mankind, of the physically productive powers of the productivity of the human intellect which drives the benefit of human labor upward per capita. It is the expression of a perpetual human productivity-in-fact, not money, which defines true economic worth for mankind.

That is the measure of the future of mankind. But, the future of mankind has a higher purpose than any man’s mere greed; that subject is the next chapter on the agenda of this report.

III. THE VALUE OF THE HUMAN SPECIES

The value of the human species resides in its successfully, and successively upward creations. In simple terms, this means the increase of the physical level of mastery of the processes within our Solar system (for example), as those may be measured in mankind’s increasing authority in the development of the accessible aspects of our proximate, upward reach within the Solar system. Convenient practical terms of reference for this purpose, were also laid down since approximately the 1890s, this time in terms of those higher expressions of energy-flux density associated with the consequences of the progress set into motion presently by the work of such as Max Planck and Albert Einstein. Thermonuclear fusion’s practical development is a conveniently approximated reference for the time being; the recent discoveries reported by China’s success in its landing on the Moon, have now suddenly become a standard of reference for current practice, with the subject of matter-antimatter lurking around still.

The more commonplace sort of practical approach to the subjects at hand among me and my relevant associates, currently, is the effective energy-flux density approach to achieving missions inclusive of those by man within Solar space, especially relatively nearby space (if only for the next moment waiting ahead).

The human standard for measure of the same achievement, is located in the realized experience of the human being regarded in its terms of being a species. The quest for a higher achievement within human reach, is our most convenient standard.

That much said now on that account; the needed perspective is the perpetual commitment to achievement of the next one of the still uncompleted, “impossible” accomplishments available in foresight ahead. This subject of “foresight,” is extremely troubling for the mere oligarchs; their shriveled imaginations are fixed on the subject of “money,” when the real issue is the urgency of accelerating mankind’s power to progress far beyond.

What is clear to those relevant persons among us presently, is that the foolishness of the children of Zeus, has put the human species, repeatedly, perilously behind what should be regarded, respected, and also feared, as representing a great risk to the continued existence of our human species. For example: the prospect of a fatal encounter of our human species with some satellite of one sort of another, should have been already worrying serious scientific thinkers for quite some time.

The implications of such foolishness as evasion of that threat, must be considered thoroughly on that account. Such is the proper measure of the practical value of the particular human creature in view of our nearby celestial habitats.

The “Brutish?” Monarchy

The key to the present global crisis of mankind, is to be located, most typically for today, by the actual role occupied by the name of the present British monarchy, its predecessor-in-principle, and by its extended, earlier, and prospective future, expressions, as the modern heir-apparent of the original evil typified by the reality and image of the Zeus, who is otherwise identified as the enemy of Prometheus. The particular, rarely understood significance of those names, is that they were known under those names, as nothing differing essentially from certain real personalities and the principles by which they are identified-in-fact of still-contemporary realities, as a matter of still-contemporary practice. For example, the nominally “British Empire,” was never anything differing in characteristics from the cult of the original Zeus.

These have become customarily identified as mythological creatures; but, that is intrinsically a systemic quality of modern customs of misrepresentation.

The actual expression for the principled characteristics of the incarnate evil of the character named “Zeus,” is the name given to an archetype attributed, as in the relevant ancient Greek sources, to the original principle of human evil otherwise known to modern society as “the oligarchical principle.”

As a somewhat clarifying matter of fact, the term Zeus, is presently a name for interchangeably-named organizations of societies whose systemic characteristic, and whose actual legacy have been what is typified in fact as “the oligarchical principle.” The particular significance of that title, is not that equivalent to the ordinary notion of “king,” or a simply defined “kingdom.” The convenient modern term of description, would include the title of “emperor.” The Roman Empire typifies the legacy of a kind of super-Zeus, as the relevant example from the Iliad, and its included genocide against the population of the mass-murdered citizens of the ancient city of Troy. The British Empire, as currently still extant, is the now customary model of reference for the currently modern history of our planet.

Thus, for example, the present form of the Saudi kingdom and its specific accomplices, are all an integral part, currently, of the British Empire under the present monarchy.

The particular, actually practical implications of such classifications from among the roster of forms of social organizations among humans, or the like, fits more or less exactly with the traditional meaning of the supposedly merely mythical figure of Zeusand his court. The implications differ very little from the recent classification of the U.S. unemployed under the just recently installed status of derelicts created by U.S. President Obama’s prescriptions for the treatment of the “long-term unemployed.” Cannibalism could be a variant of that same policy.

More immediately notable, is the policy of the currently nominal successor to Zeus, the currently, nominal Queen of England, who expresses a mimicking of the Queen of England’s influence on President Barack Obama’s policies toward the “long-term unemployed” U.S. citizens, by the Queen’s demand for the reduction of the entirety of the current human population of Earth, from a recently approximate seven billions living persons, to something in the direction of less than one billion for the entire human species. Her stated intention on that account, illustrates the reality of the presently expressed aim of a rather immediate launching of a world-wide thermonuclear war in the prospectively very near term. The evidence is already in the process of implementation, and the Queen’s active Saudi minion-dom is a currently most notable feature of both the general process afoot and its well-known advent in the so-called Anglo-Saudi “9-11” operations, just as the related actions under both U.S. Presidents George W. Bush, Jr. and, now, Barack Obama, fill such roles.

Those immediately preceding considerations are essential facts, with respect to identifying the systemically defined implications of the legacy of the Zeus-versus-Prometheus matter and its implications for not only the world, but also much of the Solar system, presently.

Next: Zeus vs. Prometheus

The foregoing information respecting the Zeus-principle, prepares the ground for addressing the necessary references which I have presented immediately above, as to the implications of the reference to the mere name of Zeus. Now, our attention is turned to the “hard facts” of this present publication’s facts, in its proper entirety, and the necessity for the preceding aspects of this report as a whole. The evidence which I shall introduce from this point of the current report, onwards, goes directly to the most crucial among the practical features of any actually competent presentation of the elementary principles of a competent study of modern economy.

IV. PROMETHEUS VS. ZEUS

The actual existence, role and importance of the original concept of Zeus-versus-Prometheus, has no different basis in ancient Greek customs than the difference of man (Promethean) from the actually human degenerates which are better identified as bestialized man. The crucial evidence is both the combined existence and progress of living mankind, and the viciously anti-humanistic (so-called “Green”) characteristics of the degenerate forms of practice associated with a growing spread of modern imperialist systems and other systems characteristic of anti-human practices, such as those of the ancient Roman empire (in particular) and such nominally British and related imperialist cultures associated with the legacy of the notions and customary characteristics of imperialist systems.

The characteristics of modernized versions of systems consistent with the tradition of Zeus, are associated with what is precisely identified as the oligarchical system’s characteristics in general, and the particular example of the degenerate practice still taught and known as Euclidean geometry, as distinct from a true, modern, physical geometry.

The distinction of a modern scientific practice, from degenerate forms familiar from many pre-Renaissance European cultures generally, stems from the beginning of modern European science of the Renaissance of such as the scientific achievements associated with the modern physicist Filippo Brunelleschi and Nicholas of Cusa, and of Cusa’s own, inspired followers such as Johannes Kepler and those whom both Cusa and Kepler had more or less directly inspired. However, the medieval tradition of relatively, historically outstanding actual science among human cultures had been reached earlier, on a grand scale, leading into pre-Renaissance and later modern engineering, with the exceptional achievements in economics and grand-scale engineering developments specific to the hitherto massive accomplishments of the work of Charlemagne in logistics and economy.

The most relevant feature of post-Renaissance scientific progress had been set into motion by such as Brunelleschi and Cusa, with Cusa actually the most outstanding of them all respecting the breadth and depth of his combined work and its consequences. These specific considerations, when situated in the setting of Cusa’s part in the process, have been, if considered in retrospect, the most influential in the consequences of their accomplishments. That much now said in necessary preparations, we may now proceed freely to the specific goal of our intentions in this present report taken as an entirety.

The True Advent of Chemistry

Truth to tell, I admit now my now very rare, but still occasional glimpses of my continued harboring of a 1942 edition of what had been long the standard Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; but, without rejecting the merits to be recognized from later editions of that reference-work, there is a systemic error in the choice of the context which that customary approach to physics and chemistry, as such, had both neglected to consider, the actual role of the human mind and its living actuality as such. Here is where my part in the history comes most directly into play, as I shall now do as indicated.

The issue is the choice of the proper definition of the chosen subject matter. Are, for example, both chemistry and physics as such the actual subject, or are they not merely products of that which creates the discovery, the products which are the actually unique powers of the development of the process which is the human mind as such? Do you think that that is merely a fair description for purposes of polite conversation; or, is the human mind as such, to be considered the organ which produces the existence of good practices of chemistry? I present the case for the latter choice of principle.

Do you propose to punish the particular mind which fails to perform as prescribed? (A common academic practice! For example.) Or, should you not place the emphasis, not on the chemistry as such, for example, but, instead, let the mind develop itself, to assume the direction of the process? (That could cut out most of the worse-than-pure-waste of funding the now customarily utterly worse-than-wasteful appetites of stock-brokerages.) What, therefore, is the challenge to society now to be set before us?

This now takes our present discussion to the core of the matter being considered in this study and report as a whole: how does mere chemistry actually take over, also on behalf of the human mind itself, rather than the lower-ranking league of such as the mere U.S. Federal NSA?

The Little-Known Mystery of Actually Thinking

How could you know, with certainty, when the mind may actually not be thinking something which can be somehow unknown to the watching observer? That presumes that interventions of the type classifiable under the heading of externally applied torture of the mind of the intended victim are excluded, either mechanically or in a related fashion. Or, how does the torturer know who to torture for what purpose? In other words, presume we exclude the Adolf Hitler-style stuff. For example: how could you torture the guy you can not identify for torture? By now, you have pointed the finger to the alternatives used by the Adolf Hitler regime and comparable cases. That brings all of the crucial issues into play; in other words, the same old oligarchical system typical of the infamous Zeus.

That is, essentially, exactly what and why Zeus did it.

Does that mean that the issue is Zeus’ methods of conditioning virtually mere slaves by means of actual or implicit mental torture? No; the issue is whether or not society will permit the existence of what can be considered an actually human quality of performance extracted from terrorized or like cases of some form of effective slavery, as by throwing Christians to the lions. The result, as the Romans demonstrated at the end of the torturing and murdering of Christians, for example, is what are fairly described as “dehumanized” human victims of such regimes as those, for example, of U.S. Presidents George W. Bush, Jr. and, most emphatically, the currently incumbent Barack Obama.

That consideration, now properly considered, brings us to the actually experimental subject of the demonstrable difference between the conditions under the reign of Zeus’s torture, and the creative mentality of the followers of Prometheus. The followers of Zeus, are, intrinsically, self-doomed to a probable species-extinction in the presently looming, nuclear-warfare-like prospects for the future of mankind.

V. THE MISSIONS OF PROMETHEUS

Sometimes, like good American citizens, we support and relish the life of being American citizens, for example, as all really good American citizens do; what we prize is the freedom of that citizenship, which I admire, and my adversaries such as George W. Bush, Jr., and Barack Obama manifestly do not. That, in itself, is an important point of great merit, in and of itself; but the subject requires us to look much, much deeper.

The essence of the subject-matter, is what is often identified as “freedom,” particularly what has been sometimes graciously known as typically American freedom; in particular, the freedom expressed by the brief existence of the Massachusetts Bay Colony before it was crushed by the Dutch mass-murderers of that century, and, later, the same tyranny was continued under the rubrics of the so-called “British” imperial system which continues to dominate the greatest single region, in subjected area, of that actual world empire up through the present date.² The Hitler regime was, from its actual beginning, originally a branch of the British imperial system, and that pretty much from the start, until the Winston Churchill bunch had decided it to be smarter to bring in the United States under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, with aid of certain British who thought that President Roosevelt was not scheduled to remain in charge of the United States for much longer after 1939. The death of President Roosevelt was used as the means for the crushing of the policies and practices of what had been the Roosevelt administration. The so-called Americans associated with then Hitler-associate Prescott Bush, played a crucial role in the process which included the convenient crushing, under President Harry S Truman, of everything essential in what had been the post-war intentions of President Franklin Roosevelt.³

The election of President John F. Kennedy until his assassination,⁴ which had since been arranged to ensure that no one would be permitted to continue to live without coming under a very efficient degree of control over the associates and offshoots of the likes of Prescott Bush. If you wished to be President, thereafter, crawl before Wall Street and London, and a place might be arranged for you. The witting submission of much of the Federal system’s reigning authorities, showed the truth of the matter, in the role of both two-term President George W. Bush, Jr., and, now, British puppet Barack Obama in their occupation of the U.S. Presidency.

The time has now come, when the mischiefs from such pasts as a U.S. Government whose best Presidents were usually assassinated, can not be tolerated by the human species any longer. The new mission of Prometheus must be brought forth, promptly, now. The present crisis-situation demands it.

The Principle of Prometheus

The principle of Prometheus, separates his identity from that of all presently known human oligarchs and oligarchies, alike. The following is the essential distinction of principle, of fully human persons, from the intellectually deformed, otherwise human victims of the quality of slavery which imitates lower forms of life. That is the essential point of distinction, of Prometheus from the children of Zeus.

The functional distinction which separates the two opposing categories in a fully systemic respect, is matter of mental distinction of the two apposite types, as finger from thumb of the same original breeding of the living stalk. The reduction of the actually human individual to a slave, is precisely a typical such distinction. The difference in type of behavior, and of the consequences of that distinction, is also the essence of the distinction of both slaves and also of slave-masters (the accomplices of Zeus), from what may be fairly identified as the Prometheans.

The most essential feature of that just-stated point of distinction, is the crucial point of emphasis to be addressed here. It is the effects of that in-bred distinction between the two types from common human origins, which is the location of the distinctions between the two apparent types. The root of the functional difference is an effect of the distinction of the creative human personality, as a type, from the willing slave. That is the core of the Promethean principle, the difference in principle of behavior of the child of Prometheus, as distinguished from the slave-mentalities which are to be associated with the notion of the qualities of the relatively systemically degraded victims of the contamination which is characteristic of the prevalent influence of the Zeus-influence.

The essentially functional distinction between the two contrasted functional types, is what is often identified as “intellectual.” The one is creative, or “intellectual;” the other, is merely “practical.” The root of that distinction can be defined as shown to beprecise. However, the expression of the relative degree of distinction, which defines a greater degree of difference between the “creative” and “merely practical,” is the locality of the distinction of relatively free persons, from those who are conditioned to submission to behavior characteristic among slaves. Such is the rule-of-thumb sort of distinction of a mental state of serfdom, and that of a person identified as animal-like bondage as slaves.

The crucial issues of distinction among the varying types which might be reasonably attributable, point to, above all, the expression of voluntary creative mental powers, in varying degrees of expression as such. The crucial quality of distinction among those exhibiting talents of active creativity, is found in those persons who have successfully cultivated the qualities of mental development of what is to be classed as scientific and related qualities of creativity comparable to those of great Classical musicians and what fall, otherwise, into both actively creative physical scientific discoverers of true physical principles, and artistic creativity of a comparable, but distinct expression of the same quality rightly identified as “genius.”

It is those persons who have been advantaged by the development of what is usefully identified as genius, who demonstrate in practice the relative qualities rightly dubbed “genius.” The proper intention of society, is to cultivate the development of all human individuals into an expression of the principle of such “genius.”

Footnotes

¹Prometheus vs. Zeus, in Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. “Back to Genesis,” in Science and the Solar System, December 9, 2013, LaRouche PAC [[http://larouchepac.com/node/29360]]

²For example: the Saudi kingdom is essentially a satellite, like other subjects of that same empire, as we should have discovered from witnessing the so-called “9-11” murder of American citizens by the joint means organized under the funding and preparing of both the British monarchy and the Saudi kingdom.

³Essentially, the U.S.A. under Truman, had been a project of the British monarchy’s supervision, in conjunction with what had always been British-controlled Wall Street operations in banking since the roots of Manhattan and the scoundrels who exploited the crushing of the original New England settlements.

⁴Sponsored by the widow of President Franklin Roosevelt, Eleanor Roosevelt, who had been the only effectively residual authority left alive following his highly successful Presidential leadership. John F. Kennedy was the last U.S. President who enjoyed an authority free from the legacy of the Anglo-American crew associated with the associates of the London-rooted role of Prescott Bush, and his off-shoots.