IDIOMA INGLES: VIDEO CONFERENCIA DE LYNDON LAROUCHE 16 DE AGOSTO 2013

IDIOMA INGLES 

 VIDEO CONFERENCIA DE LYNDON LAROUCHE 16 DE AGOSTO 2013 

ROSS: Let me ask you this final question for the evening. This is a question that comes in from our neighbors to the south,  from Alberto Vizcarra, a longtime associate of ours and the leader of the Pro-PLHINO Movement of Sonora, Mexico. Here's his question.

He says: "Dear Mr. LaRouche: Old friends of yours, together with agricultural  producers, businessmen and citizens from southern Sonora, who have for years fought for great water management projects for Mexico, such as the PLHINO and others,
now face a strategic battle, since we directly face the financial interests which, through the World Wildlife Fund, have taken control, in large measure, of water policy in Mexico, and intend, using a criminal who currently occupies the governorship of this
state, to divert the waters of the Yaqui River into speculative schemes, threatening thereby the existence of the Yaqui Valley and the Yaqui Indian Tribe. "The pretext is that water should be where it produces the most money, and they believe that using water for agriculture is a waste. It was thought that with the new Peña Nieto government
in Mexico, that these policies would change, but so far this has not happened. They want to destroy the region which had become Mexico's grain basket, and which was the cradle of Norman Borlaug's Green Revolution, the region which was emblematic of a
policy oriented to food self-sufficiency. "What do you recommend to the Mexican President in light of this situation?"

LAROUCHE: Well, this is a project which is really tied very closely to the United States, because Canada and the northern part of Mexico in particular, is an integral part of the
territory, which has to be pulled together in order to deal with the mutual problems of the three nations. Canada has a lot of water available, for example, but they lack other things. Mexico has a shortage of water, a great shortage of water in the northern parts, but they have other things. So therefore, obviously, the primary thing in Mexico is water development: It's a crucial thing. We need water development, development of water
resources, particularly in the north part of Mexico, where it's needed.

What happened is, when Kissinger got involved in something in his time back, at a time that I was pushing for our friends in Mexico, the President of Mexico was my personal friend, and we were working together to build something in Mexico. We had a plan for ten large nuclear plants in Mexico, to help deal with the water problem! In order to develop city areas, which were not so hot that the people couldn't live there in the summer season, these kinds of projects! And that's what we were involved in. It was a cooperative effort among us: Emotionally, politically, we saw a common interest between the United States and Mexico, which is rather obvious, since we're close relatives, in a sense.

So therefore, the idea is, how can we help develop the northern part of Mexico, which is the vulnerable part in terms of the water resources. And by doing that and by putting in some nuclear power plants in there, as sources for pumping this thing, and changing the climate, we could go ahead and change it. But then, you had Henry Kissinger was part of this problem: He was sent down to Mexico to sabotage what we planned to do. And he did a fair job of sabotaging what we intended to do, but he was not the author of it, he was only the accomplice. And so that happened. Now, what we have to do, as a perspective, is forget this particular Presidency, in Mexico now. We have to think about a change in the overall orientation of both the United States {and} Mexico, and in collaboration with Canada. Because the water resources of Canada, and other things of that type, combined with what we have in the United States as potential, and what we have in northern Mexico, if you combine these things as a cooperative venture among three nations, you can solve the problem. What you need -- I mean, remember the problems of government in Mexico. The problems of government in Mexico {came from outside of Mexico.} The destruction, of the Presidency of Mexico, came from {outside} Mexico! And the whole drug problem, everything else going with it, is a result of people meddling {from outside} of Mexico! The drug problem we have in the United States, in the southern borders of our United States, and the drug problems we have in Mexico, are a reflection of this kind of treasonous garbage!

I was in the middle of this thing, I was a part of the thing, I was cooperating with the Mexican government, on trying to bring this around, and with other nations in South America, as well. And they just got around to getting rid of me. But what I had stood for, what I initiated, what I played a role in, in South America generally, as in this case, was what we did, what we intended; and these other guys, directed by the Queen of
England at that time, already, made a mess of it. They made a mess of everything. They made a mess of Mexico. Now, you've got some people in Mexico who are not so nice,
in government. Well, they're a product of the British Monarchy. And the British Monarchy, I think should take a "time out" for a while, and get themselves sorted out again, because I'm sure there are many people in the British Isles, for example, who have better things to do than to kiss up to the rear end of a British Monarchy.

OGDEN: Well, I actually have one last follow-up question, to conclude. I think that people are aware, and a lot of people who are watching the webcast tonight have participated in congressional town hall meetings that are happening all around
the country. And these congressmen have had no place to hide, when they've gone back into their districts, because they've been confronted by citizens with justified rage, we could say. And a lot of people have been picking up on this. National media have
been covering the fact that these town hall meetings are getting pretty explosive.
Now, we have a little bit over two more weeks, where these congressmen have got to be facing down their constituents in these districts, and I know a lot of people who are watching this webcast are probably preparing to, in the next few days or so, go
and see their congressmen or go and see their senator. And we, as we mentioned in the beginning of this webcast -- we as a movement, have not gone on recess! We have managed to maintain the fight for Glass-Steagall and for the defeat of Wall Street, as exemplified by not only what happened in Atlanta this week, with the NCSL, but also the fight that we're continuing in California, in Sacramento which is very hot, and verywhere else around the country. So, I know our viewers will appreciate it if I ask this question, but, what are your marching orders for everybody our there over the next coming weeks until congressmen return to Washington, and what is the message that they can bring, fromyou, to these congressmen?

LAROUCHE: Well, that's not too hard for me to answer! No, what we have to do, we have a certain intellectual capability as an organization, and we don't have more than that. We have that. But it happens we live in hard times, when the intellectual life
of our nation is in poor shape, too. So, there are certain things that I know, that we know as an organization. We've tested this, we've tried this out, and it works! All we need is
more push, and also keeps me busy thinking of flanking operations, in which to catch these guys, on the assumption that maybe I'm a bit smarter than they are, and I'll outflank them and thus create an opportunity for us to accomplish something. What we're having now, as you know very well, what we're getting now, is we're getting an accelerated response to what we are doing, because we are providing the quality of leadership which in principle seems that nobody else is doing. There are good things happening in New York State, there are good things happening here and there, good programs, good ideas. But, you need something more there: You need a punch! You've got to hit into a flanking operation! You've got to outflank this problem! Because you can not just push against it, you have to let it come in, to where it gets into a position where they have outflanked themselves, and then you can do something about it. And that's what we've been doing. We've been running flanking operations against what the so-called "high-ranking" this, or "high-ranking" that -- the smell is high ranking!
And that's what it is: I just flank this stuff myself, I've had a lot of experience. I'm not in the best shape I was over the skein of my living; I'm not such good shape there. But
considering how {dumb} our government is, I feel pretty good, and smart! But only for that reason! [laughter]

OGDEN: Okay! And on that concluding note, we'll conclude the webcast. So, thanks Lyn, thank you Jason, and thank you everybody who was watching. Good night.